Investigational copper-binding tripeptide complex

AHK-Cu

aka L-alanyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine copper(II) · Ala-His-Lys–Cu(II)

Evidence grade
Grade D: Preclinical only
for topical or injected hair-growth use
User score too few reports (3) needs ≥ 10 reports
US FDA Not approved checked 2026-11-13
WADA 2026 Not named no clearance either · checked 2026-11-13
EU No data · checked 2026-11-13

User reports

approximate — combined from two independent Reddit reads

Men 45–60

0 men aged 45–60

No reports in this group yet.

All men

0 men

No reports in this group yet.

Everyone

3 people

small sample · n = 3

Outcome mixed 1 of 3 · negative 1 of 3 · positive 1 of 3

Benefits hair 1 of 3

Side effects hair shedding 2 of 3

Stopped 0 of 3 Used with other compounds 3 of 3

User reports are anecdata, not evidence: self-selected, unverified, often combined with other compounds.

In their words

  • “I started noticing very mild shedding about a month into the peptide serum”

  • “it’s ramped up concerningly since then.”

  • “Results are 1.5 months.”

  • “I've been using Neurogan 8% serum (4% GHK-CU, 4% AHK-CU) for the past 7-ish weeks. Aside from that I've been using finasteride 1 mg”

Read summaries and method notes

Read 1. No qualifying 45–60 male report, or even an explicitly male self-report, was found in the readable material; sex was therefore not inferred from hair-loss subreddits. One reporter using a topical product containing both GHK-Cu and AHK-Cu described escalating shedding after roughly a month, while another showed apparent progress after 1.5 months but was simultaneously using GHK-Cu, minoxidil, finasteride and several topical actives. The injectable-AHK thread itself was mainly a question and could not be used to infer AHK-Cu efficacy from the poster's prior GHK-Cu experience. Every usable outcome was heavily confounded by co-treatment, so neither benefit nor shedding can be isolated to AHK-Cu. Evidence was much scarcer than for GHK-Cu, which was deliberately kept separate.

Read 2. No man aged 45–60. Of 11 threads almost all were prospective questions or DIY serums; one verified user (8% GHK/AHK serum with finasteride and minoxidil for 7 weeks) reported hair shedding. Virtually no real-world outcome data exist. Reliability extremely low.

Note 1. AHK-Cu-specific reports were rare and almost always combined with GHK-Cu and established hair-loss treatments. GHK-Cu-only reports were excluded.

Note 2. Extremely sparse (n=1). Always stacked with GHK-Cu and hair-loss drugs.

Each read counted people independently. Overlap between the two reads is estimated from shared threads and removed; counts are approximate. How we count.

Summary

Alanyl-histidyl-lysine complexed with copper(II) (Ala-His-Lys·Cu²⁺), a structural cousin of GHK-Cu with excised-follicle/cell evidence. The title’s “Copper Tripeptide-3” designation was not verified as an official synonym. Marketed for hair thinning and skin quality; no peer-reviewed treatment trial of clearly identified AHK-Cu was found in this check, which had registry-access limits.

Proposed mechanism

Pyo et al. (Arch Pharm Res, 2007) exposed excised human follicles and cultured dermal papilla cells directly to AHK-Cu. Follicle elongation and cell proliferation occurred at culture concentrations spanning picomolar into nanomolar ranges. No serum concentration or clinical dose follows from that experiment. Primary paper

  • Apoptosis-related protein markers changed, but the reduction in counted apoptotic cells was not statistically significant.
  • VEGF/TGF-β background and proposed anagen/perfusion effects do not demonstrate those treatment outcomes in a living scalp. Copper-dependent collagen/lysyl-oxidase benefits extrapolated from GHK-Cu are not verified AHK-Cu clinical effects.

Reported routes: topical scalp application, sometimes with microneedling, and occasional SubQ injection are user practices. Neither scalp-barrier delivery nor clinical efficacy/safety of either route was established by the excised-follicle study; microneedling co-use is not a validated AHK-Cu regimen.

Safety

  • Human adverse-event frequencies and pharmacokinetics are not established in the retrieved evidence.
  • Excised-follicle research does not establish topical or injection safety.
  • Long-term, reproductive and interaction safety and validated contraindications are not found.
  • Skin-barrier delivery and dose-response in patients remain unverified.

From labels, regulators and trials. No signal in small studies ≠ safe.

Evidence D topical or injected hair-growth use

D stands. The only direct evidence is an excised-follicle / cell-culture study; no trial in living participants.

Human trials · 0

No human trials found for the marketed use.

Dose ranges

Reported ranges from labels and studies, with context. Not a recommendation.

No data.

Editorial ratings EDITORIAL

Editors’ judgement, 0–5. Opinion, not data; separate from grade and user score.

  • Safety 4 out of 5
  • Sleep not rated —
  • Recovery not rated —
  • Cognitive not rated —

Sources

  1. fda.gov/media/94155/download
  2. wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/2026list_en_final_clean_september_2025.pdf
  3. ema.europa.eu/en/medicines
  4. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17703734/
  5. clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=AHK-Cu
  6. fda.gov/drugs/human-drug-compounding/certain-bulk-drug-substances-use-compounding-may-pres
  7. fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/july-23-24-2026-meeting-pharmacy-c
  8. fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/drugsfda-data-files

Reddit threads read · 7

2 further sources on commercial or non-primary hosts not listed.

Research checked 2026-11-13.